Custom user role creation for more granular permissions control
R
Representative Peacock
There are only 6 roles available. However, I would like to be able to break it out more granularly. For example be able to create a role that can create/update/flag documentation, but not share. Allowing custom role creations would likely satisfy a few feature quests here by getting the permissions broken down more granularly and allowing us to choose which permission get applied to the custom role.
N
Nougat Tortoise
Absolutely a killer feature. Much needed
K
Keppel green Sloth
I too wish the permissions were more granular. In my case I want to allow some users to import and delete assets or passwords. The way it stands Editors can build a Rack but then cannot remove an Asset that they themselves assigned to the Rack.
A
Agate Chimpanzee
I was given this feature request link from HUDU Support, but I am not exactly certain my issue is the same or perhaps I have not read enough comments - HUDU is organized with Groups allowing access to a "thing", but then User Roles determine what can be done once the access is allowed - this doesn't make sense to me - basically if you can edit in one place you can edit in all? What if we want some users to be able to edit certain "things" but not others? Maybe the answer is Groups have roles as well
A
Acute Sawfish
I would be keen to see some permissions changes that benefit companies that use Hudu for Internal IS\IT documentation.
Suggestion would be the ability to grant some functions to non-admin staff, such as the ability to update lists, adjust asset layouts, access leaderboards & gold standards from Global?
M
Mandarin Turtle
This would be very helpful so we can break down edit/read only rights on a per customer basis!
Kristen W.
Merged in a post:
New security role for users
Q
Quiet Gorilla
We would like to have the ability to give a user rights to delete assets but we dont want them to delete companies.
Hope this gets implemented
Kristen W.
Merged in a post:
Allow Editors and Below to Delete Items in Bulk or Individually
R
Raspberry rose Vole
Currently, only Admins and higher have the ability to delete items in bulk or individually. This feature request proposes allowing Editors and below to have the option to delete assets, passwords, KB articles, or other records either in bulk or individually.
Use Cases:
- More efficient management of records by Editors without requiring Admin intervention.
- Reducing clutter by allowing Editors to remove outdated or incorrect data.
- Improving workflow flexibility for teams that manage data organization.
Kristen W.
Merged in a post:
Give user ability to delete card
S
Sage Sparrow
Can we have the ability to give a non admin the ability to delete a card?
We currently use the Editor role for our client's internal IT team. We cannot give them the Admin role but they do need to remove cards that contain old data synced from our RMM.
Kristen W.
Merged in a post:
Possibility to give roles access to delete function
G
Generous Vicuna
In most cases I agree with the "no delete" policy, but some scenarios it's quite frustrating that only admins can delete expirations as an example.
It would be optimal if it was an option to give some users the delete option as an administrator.
Kristen W.
Merged in a post:
give access to Core under admin but not whole admin
F
Final Ladybug
as title says, we got some internal that will help edit flags,asset layout etc but dont need access to security,users etc. if that can be moved to a separate button or able to manage it by groups would be nice.
Load More
→