Custom user role creation for more granular permissions control
F
Francesco B.
There are only 6 roles available. However, I would like to be able to break it out more granularly. For example be able to create a role that can create/update/flag documentation, but not share. Allowing custom role creations would likely satisfy a few feature quests here by getting the permissions broken down more granularly and allowing us to choose which permission get applied to the custom role.
Kristen W.
Merged in a post:
New security role for users
W
Wilmar M.
We would like to have the ability to give a user rights to delete assets but we dont want them to delete companies.
Hope this gets implemented
Kristen W.
Merged in a post:
Allow Editors and Below to Delete Items in Bulk or Individually
J
Jerry
Currently, only Admins and higher have the ability to delete items in bulk or individually. This feature request proposes allowing Editors and below to have the option to delete assets, passwords, KB articles, or other records either in bulk or individually.
Use Cases:
- More efficient management of records by Editors without requiring Admin intervention.
- Reducing clutter by allowing Editors to remove outdated or incorrect data.
- Improving workflow flexibility for teams that manage data organization.
Kristen W.
Merged in a post:
Give user ability to delete card
M
Martyn B.
Can we have the ability to give a non admin the ability to delete a card?
We currently use the Editor role for our client's internal IT team. We cannot give them the Admin role but they do need to remove cards that contain old data synced from our RMM.
Kristen W.
Merged in a post:
Possibility to give roles access to delete function
S
Sebastian Jacobsen
In most cases I agree with the "no delete" policy, but some scenarios it's quite frustrating that only admins can delete expirations as an example.
It would be optimal if it was an option to give some users the delete option as an administrator.
Kristen W.
Merged in a post:
give access to Core under admin but not whole admin
E
Emil A.
as title says, we got some internal that will help edit flags,asset layout etc but dont need access to security,users etc. if that can be moved to a separate button or able to manage it by groups would be nice.
D
David K.
It would be nice to set Asset Layouts as read only for a specific group so, that group can not edit an Asset Layout.
Kristen W.
Merged in a post:
More granular user types
T
Tanner M.
It would be nice if we were able to add more user types between editor and admin, or allow specific admin modules be added to an account by group access. I don't need an employee that needs to be creating new users, to also be able to delete a integration sync for example.
J
Jesse L.
This request is from 2021, we could really could use this feature in 2025. Please look into implementing this!
I
Invited Member
I agree have to make users admin to create folders and organize documentation is crazy
Jürgen Van Meerhaeghe
This is a dealbreaker for us. The external portal is useless for us since we have to give every employee admin access to add assets to the external portal?
Load More
→